data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4fd3/a4fd3d8848b11b3b684fdf804fa366a32e06d43c" alt="Headquarters of Netflix Inc in San Jose, Calif. © MTP/Alamy Headquarters of Netflix Inc in San Jose, Calif. © MTP/Alamy"
Benjamin Graham, the legendary investor and Warren Buffett's teacher at Columbia University, postulated that stocks should trade for a P/E multiple equal to 8.5 times earnings plus two times the growth rate of earnings.
Without some context, the P/E has limited value in finding cheap stocks. For the market as a whole, the S&P 500 Index ($INX) currently trades for 19.47 times the past 12 months of reported earnings. The average P/E since 1935 is 15.86, suggesting the market is a bit pricey.
Some industries like homebuilders and commodity producers tend to trade at low P/E multiples because earnings tumble in a hurry so investors don't want to pay too dearly. Rapidly growing companies like Netflix (NFLX), with a P/E of 382, or Facebook (FB), trading for 222 times earnings, are valued much more on the hope of future profits that bring the P/E down to something more modest.
For individual stocks, you should compare a stock's P/E with those of its competitors. It's also usually informative to compare the current P/E with the average multiple over the past three, five or even 10 years. If it's lower than average, it's a sign that you've spotted a possible bargain -- but that all depends on growth, which leads us into the next ratio to watch, the PEG ratio
The downside of the PEG ratio is that future growth rates are notoriously hard to predict. Companies' growth profiles can change, sometimes drastically. Apple (AAPL) is a good example. It trades at a svelte 0.86 PEG ratio based on a P/E of 12.2 and a five-year EPS growth rate of 14.5 percent annualized. That's appreciably lower than the 72 percent growth rate over the past five years, but still enough, if it materializes, to suggest that Apple buyers are getting a bargain.
Because there are times when cyclical companies have no earnings, the price-sales multiple can be a better indicator of a company's relative value than the P/E. Like other ratios, you should compare the P/S of a stock of those with competitors and with historical sales multiples. Sales are also more difficult to manipulate than earnings, giving a more reliable gauge of value. Keep in mind, however, that the beauty of a low P/S ratio can be spoiled by a constant lack of profitability and large levels of debt
Lower readings are preferable but keep in mind that there is more to cash flow than what comes from operations. Free cash flow is what's left over after paying down debt, buying back stock and paying dividends. Negative free cash flow is forgivable as long it's not a chronic problem, but companies that cannot produce positive cash flow from their core business operations can face eventual liquidity and solvency issues.
The metric can be useful for comparing companies within asset-intensive businesses but service-oriented businesses or those without substantial property, plant and equipment typically have little book value and trade at sky-high P/BV multiples. For instance, United States Steel (X) trades for 0.87 times book value, while LinkedIn (LNKD) fetches an astronomical multiple of 24.8 times book value.
The formula is to divide total debt (or just long-term debt) by shareholder's equity, two items both found on the balance sheet. Off-balance sheet items like pension obligations should also be treated as debt.
Lower numbers are generally preferred because high debt loads can turn into big problems in a downturn. Debt cuts both ways, however, and taking on more debt during expansionary times gives a boost to profits. Heavy established industries like utilities and industrials generally have higher debt-equity ratios than rapidly growing companies that may carry little or no debt at all. Caterpillar (CAT) has a debt-equity ratio of 2.24, while Google's (GOOG) is 0.62. The best comparisons are within industries and against a company's historical ratios.
When comparing competing investments, stocks with higher ROE demonstrate that they can produce more profit from each dollar of equity and, all else equal, should be considered the superior choice.
Companies with comparatively low ROA will need to borrow or raise equity to achieve the same amount of profit. ROA is most useful for intra-industry comparisons and the trend over a multiyear period can be more instructive than ROA for a single year or quarter.
Margins vary widely by industry and tend to be highest among manufacturers and decrease down the value chain to wholesalers and eventually retailers. Operating profit margin generally provides the best overall measure of profitability from ongoing business activities. Be aware that declining margins over time require higher levels of revenue to maintain profits at current levels
The dividend payout ratio is computed by dividing earnings per share by annual dividends per share. You want this to be less than 1.0, real estate investment trusts (REITs), master limited partnerships (MLPs) and business development companies are required to pay out nearly all net income to avoid taxation at the corporate level. It is true that earnings include many non-cash items so you will also want to check out the cash payout ratio, which is operating cash flow per share divided by dividends per share. The lower the dividend payout ratio, the greater are the chances that the company will be able to sustain and hike the payout down the road.
By John Dobosz, Forbes
Source: http://money.msn.com/how-to-invest/10-numbers-every-investor-should-know
No comments:
Post a Comment